The fatal flaw in Democratic and leftist thinking, and among far too many in government, is that any tax cuts “cost” the government money. We see this framing in debates from federal tax cuts down to the most local tax cuts.
Read more Letters: Protect red snapper | World Cup joy | Two-party failure
But this rhetoric inverts economic reality, and is completely backwards in prioritizing government programs and bureaucracy over hard-working taxpayer’s hard-earned money. The principle here is straightforward: money belongs first to those who earn it.
Tax money is always made by the worker, then it becomes the government’s by force of law. Government doesn’t create one dollar. Companies and workers create it all and government then takes part of it.
Of course we need government to provide the basics of what the private sector cannot. But we should always look at tax cuts first from the point of view of the taxpayer, from whom the money is being taken. Secondary is the impact on government and the question of where the government really needs it all. Government leaders have the habit of being incapable of cutting back spending, unlike the taxpayers from whom they are taking their money and often have to cut back.
In the debate over Florida’s proposed constitutional amendment to reduce the property-tax burden on millions of homeowners, a constant wording by the media and local government using their government social media is how much the amendment will “cost” each government.
“Homestead exemption increase could cost local governments nearly $12 billion a year,” declares a recent headline in Florida Politics, representing dozens of such in the media, which mimics government verbiage.
Much hand-wringing and scare tactics ensue, as the governments invariably list the programs most popular with residents that will be slashed. Because the government may actually have to — gasp! — cut spending, tighten its fiscal belt like the rest of us private citizens do regularly.
It’s probably worth repeating that local governments don’t have any money except that which they must take from those of us who get up every morning and work all day to make it.
Read more Best Under Armour kids product
Rarely in the messaging through the media and government outlets is it mentioned how much money local governments are getting now because of the enormous rise in property values over the past five years. Those property value increases that local governments have gobbled up in their bulging budgets are a major part of the affordability challenges we’re facing.
A Florida TaxWatch analysis found that “Florida property tax levies have been rising rapidly — increasing by nearly 40 percent in just the last three years and more than doubling in the last ten years.” However, inflation during the past 10 years was cumulatively 23% and population growth was 8.8%.
Defenders of this being government money will say that their costs have gone up a lot and they have had to hire more employees to handle more people. Yes. Those are both captured in the inflation and population growth numbers which show much, much smaller growth rates than government spending. And never, ever mentioned in this debate — although incessantly mentioned in other contexts — those same inflation costs have hit the taxpayers’ pockets too.
And unlike local governments, their income did not rise anywhere near 40% in the past three years. In fact, it’s less than a quarter of that at 9% during the past three years.
There is no other way to look at the data: Local government budgets bloated in recent years as property values poured enormous amounts into their coffers from the pockets of Floridians trying to pay the monthly bills.
And local governments did almost nothing to ameliorate their vast revenue increases by seriously considering the plight of those from whom they were taking the money. And a big reason for this is that they see the money as government money. It’s not.
Contrary to the constant phrasing that is seen on this issue, this is not local government money until the local government takes it from you and me. First and foremost, this does not cost local governments. It puts more money in millions of Floridians’ pockets. And that will allow market spending to be more efficient than government bloat. And frankly, it’s only fair to the hard-working taxpayers of Florida.
Read more 10 board and card games you’ll love if you like Sorry
Evan Power is the chairman of the Republican Party of Florida.