The Trump administration has made no bones about its frustration with the coverage it receives from various media outlets. And it’s true that many in the press haven’t been subtle about their discomfort with policies pursued by the White House.
Read more Campaign poll shows Wasserman Schultz viewed favorably by Black voters, leading primary matchup
But it would be prudent for President Donald Trump and those who serve him to remember the value of the First Amendment and to understand that, in the vast majority of efforts intended to silence the “opposition,” the White House is on shaky legal ground, to say the least.
The latest dust-up involves ABC News and “The View.” In February, the FCC — doing the bidding of the administration against a show that relishes piling on Trump — said it was investigating whether the talk show had violated equal time rules for interviews with candidates. Agency officials also said they may revoke the exemption for news shows now granted daytime and late-night talk shows.
This is all in keeping with Trump’s repeated efforts to threaten the broadcast licenses of over-the-air TV stations and networks that provoke his ire. When late-night host Jimmy Kimmel made remarks about the death of the late Charlie Kirk, direct threats led ABC to suspend Kimmel for nearly a week. Last week, Stephen Colbert’s late night show shut down permanently, with many credible observers pointing out evidence that Trump and top aides demanded Colbert’s head. This impression was underscored by a wretched, AI-generated video posted by Trump’s official account on X.com that depicts a fake Trump grabbing and assaulting Colbert before thowing “him” into a garbage bin, after which Trump appears to dance to “YMCA” by the Village People.
On one hand, it’s silly and surreal. But on a far more serious level, it’s an unfortunate intimidation tactic intended to undermine free speech protections, and it highlights the need to reform an antiquated agency and its antiquated rules that date back to the Great Depression.
Efforts to use the FCC to control discourse is a bipartisan tradition that dates back decades. Democrats for years pondered using regulatory pressure to silence purveyors of right-wing talk radio, including the late Rush Limbaugh (though they never were foolish enough to carry those plans to fruition.)
Auring the pandemic, the Biden administration eagerly sought to control “misinformation,” at times a euphemism for opposing viewpoints.
Read more UCF received nearly $20 million of revenue from Big 12 in second season
To be fair, at other times it was just flat-out misinformation. Praise the Lord and pass the ivermectin.
Politicians — left, right or in between — have no business using the power of the state to suppress free and open debate. A bad idea doesn’t become good simply because your side adopts it.
The media landscape has changed drastically since the creation of the FCC in 1934. The idea that broadcasters on radio and network television should have different free speech rights than cable or internet providers and newspapers because the public “owns” the airwaves is a relic of the past. Today’s FCC should focus on maintaining spectrum rights for broadcasters rather than regulating content under the guise of “fairness.”
Such interventions inevitably run afoul of the First Amendment. In response to the FCC’s move, ABC executives have fought back, arguing that the agency’s actions are unconstitutional and “threaten to upend decades of settled law and practice and chill critical protected speech, both with respect to ‘The View’ and more broadly.” And they’ll almost certainly prevail in court.
This editorial was adapted from one that originally appeared in the Las Vegas Review Journal. The Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board includes Executive Editor Roger Simmons, Opinion Editor Krys Fluker and Viewpoints Editor Jay Reddick. Send letters to [email protected].
Read more Lightning risk is about to ramp up in Florida. Here’s how to stay safe.